Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Es wurden 2 Ergebnisse gefunden.

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 2 von 2.

Sortieren

  1. [Rezension von: Leucht, Robert, 1975-, Dynamiken politischer Imagination]
    Autor*in: Löwe, Matthias
    Erschienen: 2018

    Standort:
    Klassik Stiftung Weimar / Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek
    Link zum Verbundkatalog:
    Gemeinsamer Bibliotheksverbund (GBV)
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek
    Beteiligt: Leucht, Robert (VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks)
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift; Rezension
    Format: Druck
    Übergeordneter Titel: Enthalten in: Germanistik <Tübingen>; Berlin : De Gruyter, 1960; 59(2018), 1/2, Seite 148-149

  2. Unzuverlässigkeit bei heterodiegetischen Erzählern: Konturierung eines Konzepts an Beispielen von Thomas Mann und Goethe
    Autor*in: Löwe, Matthias
    Erschienen: 2018

    Heterodiegetic narrators are not present in the story they tell. That is how Gérard Genette has defined heterodiegesis. But this definition of heterodiegesis leaves open what ›absence‹ of the narrator really means: If a friend of the protagonist... mehr

     

    Heterodiegetic narrators are not present in the story they tell. That is how Gérard Genette has defined heterodiegesis. But this definition of heterodiegesis leaves open what ›absence‹ of the narrator really means: If a friend of the protagonist tells the story but does not appear in it, is he therefore heterodiegetic? Or if a narrator tells something that happened before his lifetime, is he therefore heterodiegetic? These open questions reveal the vagueness of Genette’s definition. However, Simone Elisabeth Lang has recently made a clearer proposal to define heterodiegesis. She argues that narrators should be called heterodiegetic only if they are fundamentally distinguished from the ontological status of the fictional characters: Heterodiegetic narrators are not part of the story for logical reasons, because they are presented as inventors of the story. This is, for example, the case in Johann Wolfgang Goethe’s novel Elective Affinities (1809): In the beginning of this novel the narrator presents himself as inventor of the character’s names (»Edward – so we shall call a wealthy nobleman in the prime of life – had been spending several hours of a fine April morning in his nursery-garden«). Based on that recent definition of heterodiegesis my article deals with the question whether such heterodiegetic narrators can be unreliable. My question is: How could you indicate that the inventor of a fictitious story tells something which is not correct or incomplete? In answering this question, I refer to some proposals of Janina Jacke’s article in this journal. Jacke shows that the distinction between homodiegetic and heterodiegetic narrators should not be confused with the distinction between personal and non-personal narrators or with the distinction between restricted and all-knowing narrators. If you make such differentiations, then of course heterodiegetic narrators can be unreliable: They can omit some essential information or interpret the story inappropriately. Heterodiegetic narrators of an invented story can ...

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Literaturen germanischer Sprachen; Deutsche Literatur (830)
    Schlagworte: article; ScholarlyArticle; Heterodiegese; Unzuverlässigkeit; Überinterpretation; Fiktivität/Faktualität; Allwissenheit
    Lizenz:

    Open Access related to alliance or national license ; public ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess