Ergebnisse für *

Es wurden 4 Ergebnisse gefunden.

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 4 von 4.

Sortieren

  1. Selbstadressierte Fragen im gesprochenen Deutsch
    Erschienen: 2025
    Verlag:  Berlin/Boston : de Gruyter ; Mannheim : Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) [Zweitveröffentlichung]

    Selbstadressierte Fragen wurden bislang vor allem im Kontext von Wortsuchen untersucht. Unsere Studie behandelt weitere Verwendungen von selbstadressierten Fragen im gesprochenen Deutsch auf Grundlage des Korpus FOLK. Wir analysieren Fragen nach... mehr

     

    Selbstadressierte Fragen wurden bislang vor allem im Kontext von Wortsuchen untersucht. Unsere Studie behandelt weitere Verwendungen von selbstadressierten Fragen im gesprochenen Deutsch auf Grundlage des Korpus FOLK. Wir analysieren Fragen nach Informationen, nach Objekten sowie nach (der Reaktualisierung von) beabsichtigten Handlungen und Themen. Wir zeigen, dass selbstadressierte Fragen durch zahlreiche optionale Merkmale angezeigt werden, aber dennoch manchmal hinsichtlich ihrer Adressierung ambig bleiben können. Sie dienen der Selbstorganisation der Sprecher:innen und der intersubjektiv nachvollziehbaren Interaktionssteuerung, indem sie projiziertes Handeln transparent machen und kooperative Partizipation ermöglichen.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einem Sammelband
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Germanische Sprachen; Deutsch (430)
    Schlagworte: Pragmatik; Funktionale Pragmatik; Partizipation; Frage; Selbstorganisation
    Lizenz:

    rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

  2. Countering prior interactional conduct with responsive doch in German talk-in-interaction
    Erschienen: 2025
    Verlag:  New York : Routledge ; Mannheim : Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS)

    This article explores the German response token doch, which, as earlier studies claim, rejects negatively polarized utterances and reaffirms the opposite. The study demonstrates that doch can be used in response to the Other’s conduct to mark a... mehr

     

    This article explores the German response token doch, which, as earlier studies claim, rejects negatively polarized utterances and reaffirms the opposite. The study demonstrates that doch can be used in response to the Other’s conduct to mark a contrast to the Other’s understanding or push back against the Other’s challenging what the doch-speakers said before. When doch concerns the speaker’s own prior conduct, it indexes a “change-of-mind,” contradicts a produced or projected disaligned/disaffiliative/dispreferred action, and (re-)establishes consensus between the participants. The analysis shows that doch can be used after turns that do not contain grammatical or lexical negation. The results of the study reveal that a response token doch has a core meaning of indexing a contrast, contradiction, or counter to the Other’s or the doch-speaker’s prior conduct. The study concludes by discussing the implications of the results for our understanding of responsivity and negative polarity. Data are in German.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Germanische Sprachen; Deutsch (430)
    Schlagworte: Pragmatik; Interaktion; Interaktionsanalyse; Konversationsanalyse; Gesprochene Sprache
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

  3. On stance-taking with one-sided vs. two-sided shoulder lifts in German talk-in-interaction
    Erschienen: 2025
    Verlag:  Lausanne : Frontiers ; Mannheim : Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS)

    Taking a stance toward events, objects, and other persons is fundamental to human interaction. We investigate one specific body movement that is involved in stance-taking in interaction: a shoulder lift, realized as either a one-sided or a two-sided... mehr

     

    Taking a stance toward events, objects, and other persons is fundamental to human interaction. We investigate one specific body movement that is involved in stance-taking in interaction: a shoulder lift, realized as either a one-sided or a two-sided movement. Using multimodal Conversation Analysis, we trace how interactants employ shoulder lifts in different positions within responsive turns in various interaction types in German. This study reveals how the actions to which shoulder lifts contribute are bound to specific turn and sequence positions. We demonstrate how shoulder lifts are used for disclaiming the speaker's accountability or responsibility by framing their turn as non-expandable or non-expansion-worthy, thus curtailing the sequence. Furthermore, the study shows how participants orient to different types of shoulder movements, i.e., lifts with one or with both shoulders, as accomplishing different interactional tasks. By showing that shoulder lifts are a positionally sensitive resource for speakers in building stances, we showcase the potential of conversation analytic and interactional linguistic approaches to further our understanding of multimodal stance-taking in interaction.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Sprache (400)
    Schlagworte: Embodiment; Verantwortlichkeit; Verantwortungsbewusstsein; Interaktion; Deutsch; Gesprochene Sprache
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

  4. Coding actions in social interaction: Potentials and problems
    Erschienen: 2025
    Verlag:  London : Taylor & Francis ; Mannheim : Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS)

    This paper deals with one object of coding that is particularly troublesome, the coding of actions. We argue that action-coding within the framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) necessarily leads to problems due to an inherent tension between... mehr

     

    This paper deals with one object of coding that is particularly troublesome, the coding of actions. We argue that action-coding within the framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) necessarily leads to problems due to an inherent tension between criteria for good coding schemes and the properties of action in social interaction. While coding schemes require clear definitions of codes, their mutual exclusivity, irreversibility, comprehensiveness and stable coding units, action ascription is characterized by indexicality, multi-layeredness, potentially different understandings of producer vs. recipients, temporality, malleability of units and situatedness. Drawing on several studies involving action-coding, we discuss five recurrent problems of action-coding, which arise from properties of social interaction: the level of abstraction of the action-categorization, multiple and ambiguous actions, actions that do not receive uptake, crossover cases, and problems of data-segmentation. We explain the nature of the problems, present data-examples, and discuss possible solutions. Data are in German.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Sprache (400)
    Schlagworte: Konversationsanalyse; Interaktion; Pragmatik
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess