Ergebnisse für *

Es wurden 6 Ergebnisse gefunden.

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 6 von 6.

Sortieren

  1. Zur [ǝ]-Schwa Alternation von gern(e). Prosodischer Parallelismus auf der Social-Media-Plattform Twitter
    Strukturvariation entgegen vorherrschender Ökonomie-Prinzipien
    Erschienen: 2016
    Verlag:  GRIN Verlag, München

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9783668131521
    Weitere Identifier:
    9783668131521
    Auflage/Ausgabe: 1. Auflage
    Schlagworte: Schwa; Twitter <Softwareplattform>; Soziale Software; Parallelismus; Alternation; Variation
    Weitere Schlagworte: (Produktform)Electronic book text; (BISAC Subject Heading)LIT004170; alternation;prosodischer;parallelismus;social-media-platform;twitter;strukturvariation;ökonomie-prinzipien; (VLB-WN)1563
    Umfang: Online-Ressource
    Bemerkung(en):

    Lizenzpflichtig. - Vom Verlag als Druckwerk on demand und/oder als E-Book angeboten

  2. Wolfgang Steinitz (1905 - 1967) : vom Rand der Philologie in die Mitte der Wissenschaftspolitik
    Autor*in: Lang, Ewald
    Erschienen: 2010
    Verlag:  Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Online
    Weitere Identifier:
    Übergeordneter Titel: In: Gegenworte ; 14, S. 53-57
    Schlagworte: Philologie; Parallelismus; Wissenschaftspolitik; Politik; Kulturpolitik; Wissenschaftspolitik
    Weitere Schlagworte: Steinitz, Wolfgang (1905-1967); Steinitz; Philologie; Biografie
    Umfang: Online-Ressource
  3. Symmetry breaking in syntax
    Erschienen: 2013
    Verlag:  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    In this illuminating new theory of grammar, Hubert Haider demonstrates that there is a basic asymmetry in the phrase structure of any language, whatever sentence structure it takes. Moreover, he argues that understanding this asymmetry is the key to... mehr

    Hessisches BibliotheksInformationsSystem HeBIS
    keine Fernleihe
    Hessisches BibliotheksInformationsSystem HeBIS
    keine Fernleihe
    Universität Frankfurt, Elektronische Ressourcen
    /
    keine Fernleihe

     

    In this illuminating new theory of grammar, Hubert Haider demonstrates that there is a basic asymmetry in the phrase structure of any language, whatever sentence structure it takes. Moreover, he argues that understanding this asymmetry is the key to understanding the grammatical causality underlying a broad range of core syntactic phenomena. Until now, Germanic languages have been seen to fall into two distinct classes: those which take an object-verb sentence structure (OV) or a verb-object one (VO). However, by examining the nature of this universal underlying asymmetry, Hubert Haider reveals a third syntactic type: 'Type III'. In particular, he employs the third type to explore the cognitive evolution of grammar which gave rise to the structural asymmetry and its typological implications. Symmetry Breaking in Syntax will appeal to academic researchers and graduate students involved in comparative and theoretical syntax and the cognitive evolution of grammar.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Verbundkataloge
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Ebook
    Format: Online
    ISBN: 9781139084635
    RVK Klassifikation: GB 4851
    DDC Klassifikation: Germanische Sprachen; Deutsch (430)
    Schriftenreihe: Cambridge studies in linguistics ; 136
    Schlagworte: Deutsch; Syntax; Asymmetrie; Parallelismus; Germanische Sprachen; Grammatiktheorie; Kontrastive Grammatik
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xviii, 264 pages)
    Bemerkung(en):

    Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)

  4. Wiederholung, Parallelismus und Kontrast. Die Kodierung von Adversativverknüpfungen in Wissenschaftstexten Deutsch-Italienisch
    Erschienen: 2023
    Verlag:  Berlin : Frank & Timme ; Mannheim : Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) [Zweitveröffentlichung]

    Close repetitions of lexical material can create an impression of clumsiness in the style of Italian prose, while they seem to be accepted with more ease in German. The present study shows that this traditional claim needs some further... mehr

     

    Close repetitions of lexical material can create an impression of clumsiness in the style of Italian prose, while they seem to be accepted with more ease in German. The present study shows that this traditional claim needs some further differentiation. The negative effects on style take place in Italian when informationally prominent words are repeated, while informational background material may - and in certain cases even must - be repeated for clarity. The comparative study investigates lexical, syntactic and prosodic resources for indicating adversative (contrast) relations in argumentative texts from the field of humanities, written in Italian and German. It shows that, for encoding this kind of relation, Italian depends very much on lexical resources, including repetitions of words, while German makes more use of syntactic and prosodic parallelism. As a consequence, German can often dispense with adversative connectives and allows to employ word repetitions for different purposes.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einem Sammelband
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Sprache (400)
    Schlagworte: Wortwiederholung; Parallelismus; Wissenschaftssprache; Deutsch; Italienisch; Kontrastive Linguistik; Wortschatz; Prosodie; Geisteswissenschaften; Kontrastive Syntax; Informationsstruktur
    Lizenz:

    rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

  5. Parallelisms and deviations: two fundamentals of an aesthetics of poetic diction
    Erschienen: 2024
    Verlag:  London : Royal Society ; Mannheim : Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS)

    Poetic diction routinely involves two complementary classes of features: (i) parallelisms, i.e. repetitive patterns (rhyme, metre, alliteration, etc.) that enhance the predictability of upcoming words, and (ii) poetic deviations that challenge... mehr

     

    Poetic diction routinely involves two complementary classes of features: (i) parallelisms, i.e. repetitive patterns (rhyme, metre, alliteration, etc.) that enhance the predictability of upcoming words, and (ii) poetic deviations that challenge standard expectations/predictions regarding regular word form and order. The present study investigated how these two prediction-modulating fundamentals of poetic diction affect the cognitive processing and aesthetic evaluation of poems, humoristic couplets and proverbs. We developed quantitative measures of these two groups of text features. Across the three text genres, higher deviation scores reduced both comprehensibility and aesthetic liking whereas higher parallelism scores enhanced these. The positive effects of parallelism are significantly stronger than the concurrent negative effects of the features of deviation. These results are in accord with the hypothesis that art reception involves an interplay of prediction errors and prediction error minimization, with the latter paving the way for processing fluency and aesthetic liking.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Sprache (400)
    Schlagworte: Parallelismus; Ästhetik; Dichtersprache; Abweichung; Kognitive Linguistik; Lyrik / Lyrik; Sprichwort; Couplet
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

  6. Sentence judgments and the grammar of poetry: linking linguistic structure and poetic effect
    Erschienen: 2024
    Verlag:  Amsterdam : Elsevier ; Mannheim : Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) [Zweitveröffentlichung]

    The present article aims to show that the elicitation of intuitive literary-aesthetic sentence judgments taps into readers’ poetry-specific linguistic register, and how such judgment methods can be used to support and constrain future theory... mehr

     

    The present article aims to show that the elicitation of intuitive literary-aesthetic sentence judgments taps into readers’ poetry-specific linguistic register, and how such judgment methods can be used to support and constrain future theory formation in experimental poetics. In two experiments, we examined effects of deviant and parallelistic linguistic features on readers’ grammatical and literary-aesthetic evaluation of single sentences. In Experiment 1, participants rated carefully selected and modified lines of German poetry for either acceptability or poeticity (n = 40 each) on a 7-point scale; original lines featured grammatical deviations that were absent in modified versions. All investigated deviation types reduced the acceptability of the lines, but only routine licenses of German poetry increased their perceived poeticity and showed moderate to strong correlations between poeticity and deviance (i.e., low acceptability). In Experiment 2, participants made forced acceptability (n = 120) or poeticity (n = 120) choices regarding two (out of four) syntactic variants of a single sentence; variants crossed syntactic canonicity (canonical/non-canonical) and sentence rhythm (alternating/non-alternating). Acceptability choices favored only canonical syntax; poeticity choices were sensitive to both variables, and favored non-canonical syntax and alternating sentence rhythms. Our results indicate that poeticity judgments reflect categorical and gradient genre-specific well-formedness (Exp. 1), and that poeticity criteria are similar for traditional verse and for regular sentences without salient genre cues (Exp. 2). The observed prosodic and grammatical preferences suggest that perceptual fluency and conceptual challenge are prototypical characteristics of poetry reading. We conclude that sentence judgments can reveal whether and to which degree specific features of linguistic structure contribute to poetic effects.

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Sprache (400)
    Schlagworte: Lyrik / Lyrik; Poetizität; Ästhetisches Urteil; Akzeptabilität; Prosodie; Parallelismus
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess