Direkt zur Hauptnavigation springen Direkt zum Inhalt springen
Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Es wurden 7 Ergebnisse gefunden.

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 7 von 7.

Sortieren

  1. Syntactic Variation in Papiamentu/o
    Autor*in: Lloret Florenciano, Asunción ; Fischer, Susann
    Erschienen: 2018

  2. Emergent pseudo-coordination in spoken German. A corpus-based exploration
    Autor*in: Proske, Nadine
    Erschienen: 2019

  3. Fossilierung – von der Funktion zur Form
    Autor*in: Hofmann, Laura ; Ritter, Melanie ; Gierschick, Christina ; Buschmann, Frank
    Erschienen: 2016

    Export in Literaturverwaltung
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Deutsch
    Medientyp: Unbestimmt
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Deutsche Grammatik (435)
    Schlagworte: Grammatikalisierung; Sprachwissenschaft; Sprachwandel; grammaticalization; linguistics; linguistic change
    Lizenz:

    kostenfrei
  4. Co(n)texts in Grammatical Paradigms
    Autor*in: Politt, Katja Christina
    Erschienen: 2024
    Verlag:  Association française de linguistique cognitive

    Politt KC. Co(n)texts in Grammatical Paradigms. CogniTextes . 2024;25(25): 3020. ; This paper discusses the role of different kinds of contexts for grammatical paradigms. These paradigms are understood as functional sets that consist of a structured... mehr

     

    Politt KC. Co(n)texts in Grammatical Paradigms. CogniTextes . 2024;25(25): 3020. ; This paper discusses the role of different kinds of contexts for grammatical paradigms. These paradigms are understood as functional sets that consist of a structured inventory of oppositions and relations between their members (e.g. Diewald 2009, Diewald & Politt 2021, Politt 2022). As a usage-based concept, describing grammatical paradigms necessarily relies on real usage contexts. Three types of co(n)text(s) are deemed relevant to paradigms: (i) the intraparadigmatic context, (ii) co-text features (Catford 1965) co-occurring with paradigm members in discourse, and (iii) the communicative context. The relevance of each kind of co(n)text is illustrated by different studies, each showing how a co(n)text-based analysis and description of grammatical structures can enhance the understanding of functional distinctions from a usage-based point of view. Together, the three co(n)text types shape the internal structure of the paradigm, the functional niches of their members, and the choice of paradigm members in communicative situations. ; Cet article traite du rôle de différents types de contextes pour les paradigmes grammaticaux. Ces paradigmes sont des ensembles fonctionnels constitués d’un inventaire structuré d’oppositions et de relations entre leurs membres (Diewald 2009, Diewald & Politt 2021, Politt 2022). En tant que concept basé sur l’usage, les contextes d’usage réels sont nécessairement importants pour la description des paradigmes grammaticaux. Trois types de co(n)texte(s) sont considérés comme pertinents: (i) le contexte intraparadigmatique, (ii) les caractéristiques du co-texte (Catford 1965) co-occurrentes avec les membres du paradigme dans le discours, et (iii) le contexte communicatif. La pertinence de chaque type de co(n)texte est illustrée par différentes études, chacune montrant comment une analyse et une description des structures grammaticales basées sur le co(n)texte peuvent améliorer la compréhension des ...

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Linguistik (410); Germanische Sprachen; Deutsch (430)
    Schlagworte: grammatical paradigms; grammaticalization; context; co-text; communicative context
    Lizenz:

    creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
  5. On Black Magic ; How epistemic modifiers emerge ; Über Schwarze Magie ; Wie epistemische Modifizierer entstehen
    Autor*in: Maché, Jakob
    Erschienen: 2015

    Contents 1 Preface. . .1 2 Introduction. . . 3 2.1 Aims . . .3 2.2 Method . . . 3 2.3 Theoretical considerations . . . 5 2.4 Results in a nutshell . . . 5 3 Abbreviations . . .9 4 Is there a class of modal verbs in German?. . . 11 4.1 Traditional... mehr

     

    Contents 1 Preface. . .1 2 Introduction. . . 3 2.1 Aims . . .3 2.2 Method . . . 3 2.3 Theoretical considerations . . . 5 2.4 Results in a nutshell . . . 5 3 Abbreviations . . .9 4 Is there a class of modal verbs in German?. . . 11 4.1 Traditional criteria . . . 12 4.1.1 Morphological criteria . . . 12 4.1.2 Syntactic criteria . . . 20 4.1.3 Semantic criteria . . . 24 4.1.4 Conclusion . . . 30 4.2 Case studies . . . 33 4.2.1 können . . . 33 4.2.2 müssen . . . 63 4.2.3 wollen . . . 79 4.2.4 dürfen . . . 93 4.2.5 dürfte . . . 100 4.2.6 sollen. . . 106 4.2.7 mögen . . . 118 4.2.8 möchte . . . 133 4.2.9 brauchen . . . 142 4.2.10 werden . . . 174 4.2.11 scheinen and dünken . . . 182 4.2.12 drohen, versprechen and verheißen . . . 189 4.2.13 Summary . . . 198 4.3 The origin of the term Modalverb . . . 204 4.3.1 Early grammars – a morphological classification . . . 205 4.3.2 Karl Ferdinand Becker (1836) – from a morphological classification to a grammatical one . . . 207 4.3.3 Blatz (1896). . . 210 4.3.4 George O. Curme . . . 211 4.3.5 Braune, Paul and Behaghel: the decline of the semantic motivation . . . 212 4.3.6 Gunnar Bech (1949) . . . 214 4.3.7 The Duden grammar . . . 215 4.3.8 Summary. . . 217 5 The nature of epistemic modality 223 5.1 Types of modification . . . 223 5.2 Circumstantial modal verbs as event modifiers . . . 227 5.3 The case of can . . . 228 5.4 Ambiguities across categories. . . 230 5.4.1 Conditionals . . . 230 5.4.2 Causal clauses . . . 233 5.4.3 Causal wo-clauses . . . 237 5.4.4 Corrective uses of obwohl, wobei and wiewohl . . . 237 5.4.5 Contrastive während-clauses. . . 239 5.4.6 solange-clauses . . . 240 5.4.7 bevor-clauses . . . 241 5.4.8 Final damit-clauses . . . 241 5.4.9 Adverbial infinitives . . . 243 5.4.10 VP adverbs . . . 245 5.4.11 Locative modifiers . . . 246 5.4.12 Noch einmal. . . 246 5.4.13 Past operator. . . 248 5.4.14 Meta-communicative why . . . 249 5.4.15 Summary . . . 250 5.5 Ambiguities across languages . . . 252 5.6 Critical data . . . 255 5.6.1 Quantificational modal ...

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Dissertation
    Format: Online
    DDC Klassifikation: Deutsche Grammatik (435); Sprache (400); Germanische Sprachen; Deutsch (430)
    Schlagworte: modal verbs; epistemic modality; reportative modalitity; grammaticalization
    Lizenz:

    www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
  6. Die semantische Entwicklung von Intensivierern
    Autor*in: Laitenberger, Olga ; Job, Michael ; Eckardt, Regine ; Coniglio, Marco
    Erschienen: 2017

  7. Networks of meanings: Complementing collostructional analysis by cluster and network analyses
    Autor*in: Dekalo, Volodymyr ; Hampe, Beate
    Erschienen: 2018
    Verlag:  Berlin, Boston : De Gruyter

    This paper contributes to the development of collostructional analysis by taking up one of the long-standing issues in collostructional analysis, viz. the assessment and interpretation of the collexeme lists created. It uses the DWDS corpus... mehr

     

    This paper contributes to the development of collostructional analysis by taking up one of the long-standing issues in collostructional analysis, viz. the assessment and interpretation of the collexeme lists created. It uses the DWDS corpus documenting 20th century written German to study two modalverb constructions which contain either vermögen or bekommen as the first verb plus an infinitive. When expressing ‘possibility’/‘capability’, these constructions compete with the ubiquitous and strongly grammaticalized könnenconstruction. To compare their constructional semantics, the paper combines collostructional analyses with a close investigation of the verbal meanings characterizing their Vinf slots. To classify the collexemes occurring in these slots comprehensively, the semantic information provided about each Vinf collexeme by “GermaNet” is utilized in three different ways: A manual, context-sensitive classification of the top collexemes into the 15 generic verb classes provided by GermaNet is followed by cluster analyses over the semantic-relatedness values given out by the SemRel tool of GermaNet for the pairwise comparison of all possible collexeme combinations. This is complemented by a network analysis identifying collexemes that are salient or “central”, i.e. located on the largest number of “shortest paths” connecting any two collexemes. The implications of the results for the functional differential between the two constructions as well as the methodology itself are discussed.

     
    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: BASE Fachausschnitt Germanistik
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Aufsatz aus einer Zeitschrift
    Format: Online
    Übergeordneter Titel: Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 5 (2018)
    DDC Klassifikation: Sprache (400); Germanische Sprachen; Deutsch (430)
    Schlagworte: Usage-based construction grammar; collostruction analysis; cluster analysis; network analysis; German modal-verb constructions; grammaticalization
    Lizenz:

    Es gilt deutsches Urheberrecht. Das Dokument darf zum eigenen Gebrauch kostenfrei genutzt, aber nicht im Internet bereitgestellt oder an Außenstehende weitergegeben werden. Dieser Beitrag ist aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich. ; frei zugänglich