Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse in der literaturdidaktischen Rezeptionsforschung: über die Herausforderung, Verstehensprozesse zu verstehen
Abstract: Qualitative content analysis in reception studies, especially in the context of empirical research in literary learning, faces a double hermeneutic challenge. In this article, we address this challenge by providing guidelines to choose...
mehr
|
Volltext:
|
|
|
Zitierfähiger Link:
|
|
|
Abstract: Qualitative content analysis in reception studies, especially in the context of empirical research in literary learning, faces a double hermeneutic challenge. In this article, we address this challenge by providing guidelines to choose appropriate context units and modify the types of category-building provided by standard introductions to qualitative content analysis. The categories are adapted to the needs of literary reception researchers by differentiating between strictly formal and theory-based formal categories, both of which are frequently applied in literary reception studies in order to reconstruct either processes or underlying dispositions
|
| Export in Literaturverwaltung |
|
Assessing the effects of Language for all
Language for all is a method developed in the Netherlands for providing information in such a way that as many intended readers as possible both comprehend and accept this information. Readers include people with a large variety of reading abilities...
mehr
|
Volltext:
|
|
|
Zitierfähiger Link:
|
|
|
Language for all is a method developed in the Netherlands for providing information in such a way that as many intended readers as possible both comprehend and accept this information. Readers include people with a large variety of reading abilities including people with low literacy skills. Language for all can be characterized as a more accessible variant of plain language with some characteristics of easy language. In three studies the comprehension and acceptance of and preference for texts written in Language for all was evaluated, comparing original texts with a version in Language for all. Information written in Language for all was significantly better understood and accepted, and was preferable to the original version. In conclusion, Language for all is a promising effective, inclusive, and comprehensive method to provide information to people with and without low literacy skills. Further research is recommended.
|
