Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Es wurden 1 Ergebnisse gefunden.

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 1 von 1.

Sortieren

  1. Newton's apple and other myths about science
    Autor*in:
    Erschienen: 2015
    Verlag:  Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts [u.a.]

    Medieval and early modern science -- That there was no scientific activity between Greek antiquity and the scientific revolution / Michael H. Shank -- That before Columbus geographers and other educated people thought the earth was flat / Lesley B.... mehr

    Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Bibliothek
    001 N561
    keine Fernleihe
    Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky
    A 2015/8803
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Technische Universität Hamburg, Universitätsbibliothek
    2849-5561
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel
    66.581
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    Medieval and early modern science -- That there was no scientific activity between Greek antiquity and the scientific revolution / Michael H. Shank -- That before Columbus geographers and other educated people thought the earth was flat / Lesley B. Cormack -- That the copernican revolution demoted the status of the Earth / Michael N. Keas -- That alchemy and astrology were superstitious pursuits that did not contribute to science and scientific understanding / Lawrence M. Principe -- That Galileo publicly refuted Aristotle's conclusions about motion by repeated experiments made from the Campanile of Pisa / John L. Heilbron -- That the apple fell and Newton invented the law of gravity, thus removing God from the cosmos / Patricia Fara -- Nineteenth century -- That Friedrich Wohler's synthesis of urea in 1828 destroyed vitalism and gave rise to organic chemistry / Peter J. Ramberg -- That William Paley raised scientific questions about biological origins that were eventually answered by Charles Darwin / Adam R. Shapiro -- That nineteenth-century geologists were divided into opposing camps of Catastrophists and Uniformitarians / Julie Newell -- That Lamarckian evolution relied largely on use and disuse and that Darwin rejected Lamarckian mechanisms / Richard W. Burkhardt Jr -- That Darwin worked on his theory in secret for twenty years, his fears causing him to delay publication / Robert J. Richards -- That Wallace's and Darwin's explanations of evolution were virtually the same / Michael Ruse -- That Darwinian natural selection has been "the only game in town" / Nicolaas Rupke -- That after Darwin (1871), sexual selection was largely ignored until Robert Trivers (1972) resurrected the theory / Erika Lorraine Milam -- That Louis Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation on the basis of scientific objectivity / Garland E. Allen -- That Gregor Mendel was a lonely pioneer of genetics, being ahead of his time / Kostas Kampourakis -- That "social Darwinism" has had a profound influence on social thought and policy, especially in America / Ronald L. Numbers -- Twentieth century -- That the Michelson-Morley experiment paved the way for the special theory of relativity / Theodore Arabatzis and Kostas Gavroglu -- That the Millikan oil-drop experiment was simple and straightforward / Mansoor Niaz -- That neo-Darwinism defines evolution as random mutation plus natural selection / David J. Depew -- That melanism in peppered moths is not a genuine example of evolution by -- Natural selection / David W. Rudge -- That Linus Pauling's discovery of the molecular basis of sickle-cell anemia revolutionized medical practice / Bruno J. Strasser -- That the Soviet launch of Sputnik caused the revamping of American science -- Education / John L. Rudolph -- Generalizations -- That religion has typically impeded the progress of science / Peter Harrison -- That science has been largely a solitary enterprise / Kathryn M. Olesko -- That the "scientific method" accurately reflects what scientists actually do / Daniel P. Thurs -- That a clear line of demarcation has separated science from pseudoscience / Michael D. Gordin

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Quelle: Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel
    Beteiligt: Numbers, Ronald L.; Kampourakis, Kostas
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Druck
    ISBN: 9780674967984
    RVK Klassifikation: CC 3000
    Schlagworte: Errors, Scientific; Errors, Scientific; Science
    Umfang: XIV, 287 S.
    Bemerkung(en):

    Includes bibliographical references and index

    Medieval and early modern scienceThat there was no scientific activity between Greek antiquity and the scientific revolution / Michael H. Shank

    That before Columbus geographers and other educated people thought the earth was flat / Lesley B. Cormack

    That the copernican revolution demoted the status of the Earth / Michael N. Keas

    That alchemy and astrology were superstitious pursuits that did not contribute to science and scientific understanding / Lawrence M. Principe

    That Galileo publicly refuted Aristotle's conclusions about motion by repeated experiments made from the Campanile of Pisa / John L. Heilbron

    That the apple fell and Newton invented the law of gravity, thus removing God from the cosmos / Patricia Fara

    Nineteenth century ; That Friedrich Wohler's synthesis of urea in 1828 destroyed vitalism and gave rise to organic chemistry / Peter J. Ramberg

    That William Paley raised scientific questions about biological origins that were eventually answered by Charles Darwin / Adam R. Shapiro

    That nineteenth-century geologists were divided into opposing camps of Catastrophists and Uniformitarians / Julie Newell

    That Lamarckian evolution relied largely on use and disuse and that Darwin rejected Lamarckian mechanisms / Richard W. Burkhardt Jr

    That Darwin worked on his theory in secret for twenty years, his fears causing him to delay publication / Robert J. Richards

    That Wallace's and Darwin's explanations of evolution were virtually the same / Michael Ruse

    That Darwinian natural selection has been "the only game in town" / Nicolaas Rupke

    That after Darwin (1871), sexual selection was largely ignored until Robert Trivers (1972) resurrected the theory / Erika Lorraine Milam

    That Louis Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation on the basis of scientific objectivity / Garland E. Allen

    That Gregor Mendel was a lonely pioneer of genetics, being ahead of his time / Kostas Kampourakis

    That "social Darwinism" has had a profound influence on social thought and policy, especially in America / Ronald L. Numbers

    Twentieth century ; That the Michelson-Morley experiment paved the way for the special theory of relativity / Theodore Arabatzis and Kostas Gavroglu

    That the Millikan oil-drop experiment was simple and straightforward / Mansoor Niaz

    That neo-Darwinism defines evolution as random mutation plus natural selection / David J. Depew

    That melanism in peppered moths is not a genuine example of evolution by ; Natural selection / David W. Rudge

    That Linus Pauling's discovery of the molecular basis of sickle-cell anemia revolutionized medical practice / Bruno J. Strasser

    That the Soviet launch of Sputnik caused the revamping of American science ; Education / John L. Rudolph

    Generalizations ; That religion has typically impeded the progress of science / Peter Harrison

    That science has been largely a solitary enterprise / Kathryn M. Olesko

    That the "scientific method" accurately reflects what scientists actually do / Daniel P. Thurs

    That a clear line of demarcation has separated science from pseudoscience / Michael D. Gordin.