Wer-Was-Wo - Detailanzeige
Ergebnisanzeige "Das Enigma des Pikaresken / The enigma of the picaresque"
|Ressourcentyp||Call for Papers|
|Titel||Das Enigma des Pikaresken / The enigma of the picaresque|
|Beschreibung||Post-/Graduate Workshop: The Enigma of the Picaresque / Das Enigma des Pikaresken
Freie Universität Berlin
Jens Elze: firstname.lastname@example.org, Sarah Wollin: email@example.com
Despite their great spectrum of variety, it seems that the journeys which the narrator-protagonists of (fictional) autobiographies (re-)embark upon share a common telos: that of formulating the grand narrative of their life and consequently formulating their self, either by finding God (confessio) or their own true identity (Bildungsroman). Evidently, picaresque autobiographies form a very conscious exception to this rule. Although their relators insistently assert to demonstrate their reformed self through their stories, the narratives are inherently ambivalent and, indeed, parodistic of the above autobiographical traditions.
Be it in play or in earnest, autobiographical texts always seem to implicate an important hermeneutic facet, both diegetically and extradiegetically. With regards to this hermeneutic effort, the enigma – as a rhetorical trope and textual dynamic – may be a productive mode through which both the picaresque narratives themselves, their intertextual dialogues with other genres, and the concept “enigma” itself may be newly examined. For within picaresque texts, the enigma cannot simply be read as an example of allegoria obscurior requiring an educated reader to reconstruct its meaning, as described in classical and renaissance rhetoric; nor can it be understood as cryptical writing requiring (necessarily deficient) hermeneutic explanation, as in Christian exegesis. Rather, picaresque narratives draw on these conceptual traditions of the enigma and expand, transform and delimit them to become textual dynamics or processes which may be termed “the enigmatic”. Indeed, picaresque narratives parodistically exponentiate the difficulties of their reading to the point of the enigmatic becoming a ludic end in itself, rather than a means to attaining insight into the picaro’s true self beyond the pseudo-confessional or etiological surface.
With view to the main areas of convergence of the conceptual history of the enigma and of research on the picaresque, this workshop will have three thematic focal points: First, picaresque narratives, which may be examined with view to the terminological intersection of ainigma and griphos (which also connotes riddle but also describes a kind of fishing net). Accordingly, “an enigma is [textually] woven,” and the picaro is the one who “intertwines and twists discourses and artifices is a past master of the art of bending and interweaving things” (Sarah Kofman). Second, picaresque subjectivity, which may be examined with view to the conceptual relation between enigmas and mirrors, as described in Christian exegesis: “nunc videmus per speculum in aegnimate” (St. Paul) – a declaration which may, subversively, describe the image the picaro constructs of himself through the self-reflection he performs in his retrospective narration. Third, the picaresque genre, which has been the subject of two recent conferences (The Paradigm of the Picaresque, Würzburg, 2005; The Syntagm of the Picaresque, Munich, 2009). This workshop hopes to build on the results of these conferences, either by establishing the enigmatic as a central syntagmatic/paradigmatic element of the picaresque, or by identifying the enigmatic as a textual dynamic that problematizes the very systematization of this genre into a closed syntagm or paradigm.
The aim of this workshop is to bring together graduate, postgraduate and senior researchers in lively and productive discussions in German and English based on their presentations of max. 30 minutes. We invite post-/graduate researchers of literary studies to submit abstracts of no more than 250 words addressing the issue of the enigma of the picaresque by April 30th 2012. Topics of interest might include, but are not limited to:
• Picaresque narratives – classical/renaissance rhetoric – enigma as topos
• Enigmatic mirrors – picaresque constructions of subjectivity
• The picaresque – poststructuralist theories of ainigma-enigma/griphos-text
• The picaresque as an enigmatic genre
• (Post-)hermeneutic/enigmatic readings of and within picaresque narratives
• Picaresque enigmas?
|Quelle der Beschreibung||Information des Anbieters|
|Person||Name: Sarah Wollin
|Kontaktdaten||Name/Institution: Friedrich Schlegel Graduiertenschule für literaturwissenschaftliche Studien, Freie Universität Berlin
Strasse/Postfach: Habelschwerdter Allee 45
|Schlüsselbegriffe||Literaturwissenschaft; Erzähltheorie; Komparatistik (Kulturvergleich, Interkulturelle Literaturwissenschaft); Literatur 1500 - 1580; Literatur 1580 - 1700; Literatur 1700 - 1770; Literatur 1770 - 1830; Literatur 1830 - 1880; Literatur 1880 - 1945; Literatur nach 1945; Literatur- u. Kulturgeschichte; Literaturtheorie: Themen; Rhetorik; Stilistik|
|Zusätzliches Suchwort||Enigma, Pikareske|
|Klassifikation||03.00.00 Literaturwissenschaft; 03.00.00 Literaturwissenschaft > 03.06.00 Literaturtheorie; 03.00.00 Literaturwissenschaft > 03.10.00 Stilistik. Rhetorik; 03.00.00 Literaturwissenschaft > 03.12.00 Interpretation. Hermeneutik; 04.00.00 Allgemeine Literaturgeschichte; 04.00.00 Allgemeine Literaturgeschichte > 04.03.00 Vergleichende Literaturgeschichte; 10.00.00 16. Jahrhundert > 10.11.00 Gattungen und Formen; 11.00.00 17. Jahrhundert; 11.00.00 17. Jahrhundert > 11.10.00 Gattungen und Formen; 12.00.00 18. Jahrhundert; 12.00.00 18. Jahrhundert > 12.11.00 Gattungen und Formen|
|Ein Angebot von|
|URL dieses Wer-Was-Wo-Datensatzes||http://www.germanistik-im-netz.de/wer-was-wo/25212|